The Linbo updated VF completion plan (CD)

19 thoughts on “The Linbo updated VF completion plan (CD)

  1. Nearly 400 views on this page yesterday – one of the most popular pages ever. I guess its because few of us these days have a CD reader.

    1. Yep, it’s another year later and server renewal time is around the corner. Unsure what to do again, as the total cost for all websites is £300 per annum and in reality is it of use? Yes, I think it is but…..last year sponsorship was promised which failed to materialise.

  2. Jerry, it seems the PC want the old village to receive those useless CDS LinBo sent us? Wot no broadband to download from here and you all still use CD drives on your computer’s over there! It’s 2 different world’s eh?

    1. I only have one CD Drive and its in my old Mac. Many people don’t have them these days. What a waste of money and time as said they are listed here and linked on Facebook to download.

      When you say the PC, you mean Dawn Laird who is clearly requested them. Maybe donate your old ones for redistribution in the Village Hall for those people who are really desperate to see the files.

  3. Jerry, the letter states Public Open Spaces but these forms seem to be more relevant to listed buildings? How many of those are there on VF? Some may need these forms by the time VF is finished? LOL!

  4. The Remarkable Group have just delivered the same information to all of the village. All they had to do was upload it to a website, as I am sure that is easier to access than files from a CD-Rom. 🙂

  5. This file is very interesting.

    There is business block between the school and the Gym. There are at least two more near the roundabout on the right exiting Mitchell Way.

    The Guardroom doubles in size plus what looks like 24 houses. All shown on the playpark file.

    EDIT: I think its the original plan but with 24 houses and what could be the Guardroom doubling in size and the original PUB and NURSERY. Difficult to know.

  6. Today, Mike South, Margaret Flint, Nigel Moor and Geoffrey Clifton-Brown briefed their concerns to CDC in Cirencester in regards to the future amendments to the PLAN.

    It is imperative that once the plans are loaded onto the CDC Portal that you make comments if you think it relevant.

  7. Hello Jerry, do you have a provisional date when you expect the plans to be loaded onto the CDC Portal?

    It would be great if you could give people the link to the area of the CDC Portal that allows you to leave comments, and of course the reference number to find the plans.

    1. Gareth , CDC promised the information including the official application from Bovis would be loaded last Friday but as of last night nothing has been uploaded but this may well be a second thought after our meeting because we did highlight the shambles of the files on the CD so we must just watch and wait!

      1. Thanks for the feedback, I had a correspondence from Cllr Moor which suggested the plans have to go through a validation prior to being loaded in the portal. I spent some time educating myself on the best way to search the portal for new applications within the upper rissington parish council, so I am now equipped to keep my eyes peeled ?

  8. Jerry, I have just received a message from Nigel Moor advising that the has only received 2 queries and add that to the query Gareth has already submitted it does look like the majority of home owners on Victory Fields have not got the time to wade through all this rubbish on the CD’s and I am still concerned that many people either have no ability to view what’s on the CD’s or the technology to download and view those large files. Nigel is in the process of summarising all our queries so that there will be sufficient questions requiring a response on November 3rd. If people do not speak up now they will have to accept whatever they are handed over the next 5 years, including the risk of exorbitant Maintenance charges for grass mowing and litter picking with no way out!! I am aware that some home owners believe that they will manage to avoid these payments so all I can suggest is they read the TP1 that we all have!

  9. Mike that is not very good at all. Been busy doing other stuff – but rest assured Nigel will have some feedback from myself. I know Max has sent some.

    1. David, that is exactly why nothing has been achieved and there is so much still to be addressed! The developers are not stupid as many people think but they are out to make money and do whatever they can to save it for their shareholders not their clients! Its wrong but that is not for us to sort out but it is in all our interests to claim what is rightfully ours! I believe the CDC’s are intended to mislead but we must also be vigilant as Bovis Technical Division is now almost entirely outsourced to consultants who have not been fully informed of the history! From the last Public meeting it is now clear that Linden have no interest in hanging around and are quite content to leave Bovis with the fall out!

  10. The CD is very poor for people who want to see what is changing if they haven’t been watching what has been going on and not easy for those who have been watching.

    You can look at drawings of a similar date and find differences, so how on earth are you able to work out what is to be the finished article and what has it changed from 🙁

    And we know there are issues with footpaths that start/end on private property.

    I would be fuming if I had bought a house on the boundary of the airfield and then see the soil dumping blocking the view and the south playing field is a disgrace 🙁

    PS And I’ve not talked about what’s in the soil but I’ll leave that to people who are better informed.

Make a change, make a comment?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.